SIGN UP
DONATE
CONTACT US
ABOUT US
HOME IN THE NEWS POLI'S CORNER WING NUTS GET INVOLVED
Sign Up
Send us your email and we'll keep you posted.

About Polianna
PoliAnna.com was founded to provide moral support, guidance and the truth for everyone tired of seeing American ideals getting pushed around by dishonest right wing, loudmouth bullies.



Kill Bill - Volume 4:
Fair and Balanced, my ass!
Bill O'Reilly
Summing up the Vice Presidential Debates
FOX News
Oct. 7, 2004
Last night, Dick Cheney got the nod because he stopped the bleeding caused by the president's lackluster performance last week. No matter who you think won last night, there's no question Mr. Cheney had command of the issues.
Full Article
Bill O'Reilly and Dick Cheney have a lot in common, and it's plain to see that these bonds fuel Wild Bill's admiration for the Vice President.  Both are mean spirited attack dogs with little regard for the truth, only Cheney seems to have a slightly better command of the facts.

Read On!
MYTHS AND ASSUMPTIONS: REALITY
The pro-Kerry "New York Times" editorial page painted a far different scenario. They described Cheney as looking, "tired and angry," while John Edwards looked, "serious and tough." The Times provided  exhaustive coverage this weekend that was objective and neutral. Wild Bill just can't seem to process objectivity because it so foreign to him.  Besides, Cheney is tired, mean, and scary, even if he does have good command of the facts that he distorts.
CHENEY: Well, the reason they keep mentioning Halliburton is because they're trying to throw up a smokescreen. They know the charges are false.

O’Reilly: OK. Now, the Vice President should know by now that Halliburton is going to come up. And he should have one disarming fact in his quiver — assuming one exists. But both candidates did score points, to be fair.
How about the simple fact that (aside from the blatant and heinous notion that the company he headed of got no bid contracts in the billions, while overcharging the taxpayers, for a war that he advocates) Cheney wasn’t answering the questions? See our "Where's the Outrage" feature.

GWEN IFILL, MODERATOR: Yet French and German officials have both said they have no intention, even if John Kerry is elected, of sending any troops into Iraq for my peacekeeping effort. Does that make your effort or your plan to internationalize this effort seem kind of naive?


SEN. JOHN EDWARDS (D), VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Well, let's start with what we know. What we know is that the president and the vice president have not done the work to build the coalition that we need.


O’Reilly: No, let's start with answering the question. He never answered the question. See, if I were Gwen, I would have said, no, let's start with answering the question. — But that's why I'm not there and she is.

Edwards did answer the question.  Our questions is why doesn’t O’Reilly address Edwards’ point? Where are our allies? We're in Iraq with 135,000 troops and besides the British, we're lucky we have Vanauatu on our side.
Bill O'Reilly and Dick Cheney have a lot in common, and it's plain to see that these bonds fuel Wild Bill's admiration for the Vice President. Both are mean spirited attach dogs with little regard for the truth. Only Cheney seems to have a slightly better command of the facts. And of course, Cheney had met Edwards before. . .

We don't buy Bill's claim to being undecided, although his recent flirtations with reality, as evidenced by his criticisms of the administration's handling of the war, have us worried about his health.


Get involved

JohnKerry.com