SIGN UP
DONATE
CONTACT US
ABOUT US
HOME IN THE NEWS POLI'S CORNER WING NUTS GET INVOLVED
Sign Up
Send us your email and we'll keep you posted.

About Polianna
PoliAnna.com was founded to provide moral support, guidance and the truth for everyone tired of seeing American ideals getting pushed around by dishonest right wing, loudmouth bullies.



Wing nuts on the verge of a nervous breakdown
White House photo by Eric Draper
Jose Maria aznar
Triumph of Hope: Bush's Reelection Gives the Free World a Second Chance
Wall street Journal
November 7, 2004
George W. Bush has not only had to face the enemies of democracy but also stand up to a front of rejection made up of various different groups, a veritable negative coalition whose only unifying principle was to ensure that he was defeated. Some observers believed that the majority would now pronounce itself to be against the decision to go to Afghanistan and Iraq in order to prevent the terrorist threat from rising. The temptation of comfort and convenience is a powerful one. Our democracies are not especially well prepared for the idea that they are under threat. They are not well prepared to combat an enemy that is as diffuse as it is daring and lethal.
Full Article
Just to remind our readers who Mr. Aznar is: one of the few heads of state to defy their people's will and join Bush's adventure in Iraq. His nation's overwhelming opposition to the war (92%) led to his defeat in March of 2004. His Popular Party has strong ideological ties to the fascist Franco regime.

What is this guy doing in an American op-ed page?! It is an outrage that he thinks he can come here and tell us what a patriot is, and basically accuse 56 million Americans of joining forces with the terrorists.
Read On!
MYTHS AND ASSUMPTIONS: REALITY
"George W. Bush has not only had to face the enemies of democracy but also stand up to a front of rejection made up of various different groups, a veritable negative coalition whose only unifying principle was to ensure that he was defeated." The association here is clear. Americans who oppose Bush's policies are with the terrorists, and un-American enemies of democracy!
"Some observers believed that the majority would now pronounce itself to be against the decision to go to Afghanistan and Iraq in order to prevent the terrorist threat from rising. The temptation of comfort and convenience is a powerful one." More of big lie strategy - conflating Iraq with the war on terrorism, even in the victory gloating. One more time - Iraq was not involved in 9/11, it has only become a terrorist hive since we invaded. 
"The American people have decided that the best option is to offer a new mandate to Mr. Bush. If not, the achievement of these elections would be inexplicable: an extensive margin between the two candidates.... Mr. Bush has managed to consolidate a movement that has been emerging for some years. He has managed to consolidate a natural conservative majority in his country." 3% is not "extensive".  In fact a better adjective might be 'marginal'. There is no"natural conservative majority". only 35% of voters call themselves "conservative" (and 15% of them voted for Kerry).
"Over the last few months we have witnessed numerous attempts to introduce and exploit issues that have the greatest capacity to create divisions. Power has been abused, and a damaging sense of polarization has set in. Hatred has been promoted in the place of understanding. Unity has been replaced with division." All too true. The gay marriage amendment was a red-herring wedge issue. Bush has used executive power to keep secrets, reward his cronies and punish his enemies. And he squandered the nation's great unity after 9/11 by choosing to invade Iraq, which the Republicans used as their main campaign issue in the 2002 midterms. .
Bush's "policy does not shy away from unpleasant realities, but faces up to them, because it knows that this is the only way of overcoming them." Memo from the reality-based community: Iraq had no WMDs. Saddam was not behind 9/11. National Intelligence Estimates on Iraq is that we are losing. (Best case: "tenuous stability.")
Just to remind our readers who Mr. Aznar is: one of the few heads of state to defy their people's will and join Bush's adventure in Iraq. His nation's overwhelming opposition to the war (92%) led to his defeat in March of 2004. His Popular Party has strong ideological ties to the fascist Franco regime.

What is this guy doing in an American op-ed page?! It is an outrage that he thinks he can come here and tell us what a patriot is, and basically accuse 56 million Americans of joining forces with the terrorists.

Once more time: The Iraq war was a profound diversion from the real war on terrorism.  It was sold to the American people and the world on false evidence, and assumptions. There were no WMDs, and Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. However, Saudi Arabia did. Iran supports terrorist organizations, including the Hezbollah guerrillas that killed 241 American soldiers in Lebanon in 1983. They now are making nuclear weapons. So is North Korea.  Both of these countries would sell nuclear weapons to terrorist groups. America's ability to stop them is greatly diminished. We have far less 'political capital' in the world, to use putting coalitions together because of the Iraq war.


Get involved
Democracy for America