There is a lot of
anti-Bush content on the web and on this site. Don’t we
have anything positive to say? There is a whole world of positive
and innovative policy solutions to today’s problems that
we will be exploring, highlighting and advocating in great deal
after the election, however it turns out. But for today, we all
pray that this legacy of distortion, deception, secrecy and failure,
cloaked behind God, country and 9/11, will be put to an end next
Tuesday. I don't like to harp negative, but I fear for the future
of American democracy if Bush gets re-elected. This is the most
dishonest and malfeasant administration in recent history. They
have combined rampant corruption, ineptitude and bad judgment
with a disdain for openness, and it has produced abject failure
abroad and unparalleled deficits and divisions at home. If it
walks like a duck and talks like a duck, the chances are that
it’s a duck. And let’s just say that the Bush political
strategies and method of governance have left a lot of feathers
around. And nobody seems to be calling them on it besides a few
columnists, the left side of the web and blogsphere. Bush and
Co. continue to get away with stuff that would make Nixon and
his cronies blush. The prospect of a second Bush term, in which
they never have to face the electorate again, with a Republican
House and Senate, after running a campaign based on mobilizing
their fundamentalist base, while excluding as much of everyone
else as possible, is scarier than any Halloween slasher movie
that I can think of.
Let's ponder a few of the abhorrent traits that seem not to bother
the God-fearing masses in the red states. Secrecy, deception,
cronyism, insularity, all executed with zealous tenacity. This
administration has hidden the truth, distorted facts, taken statements
out of context, and denied the multitudinous negative consequences
of their bad policies and governance. It’s very clear that
they have a problem with reality, especially since reality has
often contradicted their claims, and infringed on their sense
of ruling class entitlement - their "due".
Many
readers were shocked a few weeks ago by this passage from the
New York Times Sunday Magazine that chronicled the Bush
mind set:
In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire
that the White House didn't like about Bush's former communications
director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser
to Bush. He expressed the White House's displeasure, and then
he told me something that at the time I didn't fully comprehend
-- but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush
presidency.
The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based
community,'' which he defined as people who ''believe that solutions
emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.'' I nodded
and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism.
He cut me off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,''
he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create
our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously,
as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities,
which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out.
We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left
to just study what we do."
(Without a Doubt. Ron Suskind, New York
Times Magazine, October 17, 2004)
This example of the Bush hubris and insanity stands out like a
modern remake of Dr. Strangelove in its Machiavellian and Orwellian
nature. What if God tells Bush to bomb France? What if Rumsfeld
thinks that the Russians have tampered with his precious bodily
fluids?
The Machiavellian nature of this administration’s relationship
with the public, the press and the real world deserves a lot more
attention than the liberal media seems to afford. Kevin Phillips
points out how Machiavelli advises that the “great majority
of mankind is satisfied with appearances, as though they were
realities.” And of course this train of thought is not lost
on Karl Rove, the great student of Machiavelli and Lee Atwater.
Phillips goes on to instructively note that:
In The Prince, his most famous work, he lauded the success
and effectiveness of the Borgia pope Alexander VI, “who
did nothing else but deceive men.” He advised that “a
prince must take great care that nothing goes out of his mount
which is not full of the above-named five qualities, and, to see
and hear him, he should seem to be all mercy, faith, integrity,
humanity, and religion.” However, because “everybody
sees what you appear to be, few feel what you are,” a ruler
can ignore the mob and devote himself to the interests of the
ruling class, gulling the inert majority who constitute the ruled.
Borgia references aside, twenty-first century American readers
of The Prince may feel that they have stumbled on a thinly disguised
Bush White House political memo. (Kevin Phillips, American
Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of
Deceit in the House of Bush. P 147-8)
The Bush political strategy is to distort the truth, lie outright,
and suppress as much of the opposition vote as possible. Doesn't’t
this bother anyone? Examples of Bush lies and distortions abound,
and I will provide several references below, but the one I will
point out here is the line from Bush’s stump speech about
how John Kerry would subvert American security to a global test
before America could take military action.
Here’s
the transcript of what Kerry actually said:
KERRY: The president always has the right, and always has
had the right, for preemptive strike. That was a great doctrine
throughout the Cold War. And it was always one of the things we
argued about with respect to arms control.
No president, through all of American history, has ever ceded,
and nor would I, the right to preempt in any way necessary to
protect the United States of America.
But if and when you do it, Jim, you have to do it in a way that
passes the test, that passes the global test where your countrymen,
your people understand fully why you're doing what you're doing
and you can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate
reasons.
Here we have our own secretary of state who has had to apologize
to the world for the presentation he made to the United Nations.
It is very clear that Kerry said that he would never cede America's
right to pre-emptive action, however any pre-emptive action should
be done for very sound reasons, that are in fact true, and in
a way that doesn’t turn most of the world against us. Like
lying, and distorting the truth about weapons of mass destruction
to the country and to the world as a pretext for a war, and then
having no plan to secure the peace afterwards, for example.
They
invented the image of Al Gore as a pathological liar in 2000.
How many people realize that he never made the statement that
he invented the Internet? Unfortunately, Gore was not politician
enough to call them on this. They invented the image of Kerry
as a flip-flopper this year, using distortion and lies. They’ve
even doctored the audience images in their closing campaign ad.
(For a good graphic proof of this see Daily
Kos 10/27).
The shamelessness does not stop there. One of their key campaign
strategies is suppressing votes. Rove and Co. have every precinct
in the country charted, and they know not only how many fundamentalists
they need to get to the polls, but exactly how many Jewish Grandparents,
Latino immigrants and urban black folks they need to disqualify.
All of this talk about record turnout and early voting has them
plenty nervous. They claim that they are merely trying to stop
voter fraud, but the truth is very obvious. In a very tight race,
where it will go down to the wire, they are playing offense and
defense. Part of their game plan is to stop the other side from
scoring. The current litigation over voter registration challenges
in Ohio is ample proof of this. (NY Times: Ohio
Court Battles Flare Over Challenges to Voters)
Once again, the liberal media was a little bit lax in investigating
the widespread charges of voter suppression in 2000. It is happening
again. Here are a few reliable sources:
Secrecy
This has been one of the most secret administrations in history.
Perhaps they are shrouded in secrecy because they had something
to hide. Their front man is only passable working off of scripted
text, to pre-screened audiences, if possible. This explains why
Bush has had fewer press conferences than any president in the
modern era. His unscripted performances at press conferences and
the debates betray this reality.
But it runs deeper. W and company suffer from a reflexive fear
of sunlight. A report by Congressman Henry Waxman concluded that
that under Bush, laws that are designed to promote public access
to information have been undermined, while laws that authorize
the government to withhold information or to operate in secret
have repeatedly been expanded. The cumulative result is an unprecedented
assault on the principle of open government.
This is the same administration that went to court to prevent
public access to the records of its secret energy policy commission
and then went to war and gave lucrative no-bid contracts to the
Veep’s company. This fits well into the Machiavellian mold.
Voter
Suppression Sources
Voter
Purge Lists in Florida Still Contain Inaccurate Information
CivilRights.org
Phone-Jamming
Was an Outrage: Republicans Should Speak Out In Anger
By BOB SMITH (Former Republican U.S. Senator), For the Concord
Monitor
Long
Shadow of Jim Crow
PFAW
and NAACP.
Voter
Registration Fraud Clearinghouse
Daily
Kos
RNC
Funds Voter Suppression Efforts
Daily
Kos
Deceptive
Tactics Inflate GOP Voter Registration
The
Oregonian
Vote
Watch 2004
eriposte
Election
Chief Warns Of Absentee Scam
St.
Petersburg Times (FL), 10/22/04
Big
G.O.P. Bid to Challenge Voters at Polls in Key State
New
York Times, 10/23/04
Bush
Secrecy Reliable Sources
Bush Secrecy
Public
Citizen
Secrecy
in the Bush Administration
Henry
Waxman, House Committee on Government Reform Minority Office 81
pages.
Open the
Government
http://www.openthegovernment.org/
Project
on Government Secrecy
Federation
of American Scientists, News, administration policy documents
All
That Secrecy is Expensive
Noah
Schachtman, Wired News, 8/27/04.
HIDING
PAST AND PRESENT PRESIDENCIES: The Problems With Bush's Executive
Order Burying Presidential Records
John
Dean, Findlaw.
John
Dean Warns of Bush Secrecy
Alex Friedrich, Monterey Herald, 8/21/04.
|